edited
-
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 736
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 8:13 pm
- Contact:
- captnkirk
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 942
- Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2013 4:54 pm
- Location: Cherryville NC
- Contact:
-
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 422
- Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 7:10 pm
- Contact:
- andy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 2:05 pm
- Location: Lake James, NC, USA
- Contact:
-
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 736
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 8:13 pm
- Contact:
Last edited by MauleMechanic on Wed Apr 13, 2016 11:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 736
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 8:13 pm
- Contact:
- crbnunit
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 1890
- Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 12:42 pm
- Location: Alaska
- Contact:
That is a beautiful area. If that is part of the national park, you can give up that idea right now. If national forest, maybe but doubtful. Agreed about the proximity to the Appalachian Trail. That is probably a deal breaker right there.
The only national park I know of that actually welcomes general aviation is Wrangell/St Elias here in Alaska though I have landed in Gates of the Arctic as well.
The only national park I know of that actually welcomes general aviation is Wrangell/St Elias here in Alaska though I have landed in Gates of the Arctic as well.
You have to make up your mind about growing up and becoming a pilot. You can't do both!
- Andy Young
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 7:10 am
- Location: Alaska, Antarctica, Colorado, and Others
- Contact:
I've landed all over Denail National Parl as well, with impunity. Unlike Wrangell-St. Elias, I would not say it's exactly welcome (other than on the glaciers on the south side) but I've never been harassed there either.crbnunit wrote:That is a beautiful area. If that is part of the national park, you can give up that idea right now. If national forest, maybe but doubtful. Agreed about the proximity to the Appalachian Trail. That is probably a deal breaker right there.
The only national park I know of that actually welcomes general aviation is Wrangell/St Elias here in Alaska though I have landed in Gates of the Arctic as well.
In the lower 48, however, I can't imagine being able to land off-field in a national park without serious legal consequences. My understanding is that the only reason we can in Alaska is due to concessions gained during the ANILCA negotiations.
-
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 736
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 8:13 pm
- Contact:
Last edited by MauleMechanic on Wed Apr 13, 2016 11:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 736
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 8:13 pm
- Contact:
- Andy Young
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 7:10 am
- Location: Alaska, Antarctica, Colorado, and Others
- Contact:
I looked into the regs on landing on Forest Service land once years ago. What I found at that time is that there is no specific prohibition, but it can only be done with the written permission of the Forest Service office that controls that area. The Forest Service told me that getting such permission was extremely unlikely at best.
- montana maule
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 7:27 am
- Contact:
- andy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 2:05 pm
- Location: Lake James, NC, USA
- Contact:
Here's a really good treatment of recreational use back country airstrips from the Recreational Aviation Foundation in 2011: http://www.blm.gov/style/medialib/blm/n ... cLands.pdf. Pages 28 - 29 show a list of States and public airstrips with agreements for USFS to maintain back country airstrips. Idaho has a lot due to efforts by the Idaho Airmen's Association (of which I'm a humble member even though I live in NC). I joined back in 2012 when I attended Lori McNichols' Mountain Canyon Flying seminar in McCall ID (which I highly recommend). Unfortunately, States East of the Rockies don't seem to have any agreements.
Andy
1986 MX7-180
1986 MX7-180
- crbnunit
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 1890
- Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 12:42 pm
- Location: Alaska
- Contact:
I specifically asked the rangers the last time I was in Denali. According to them, there are only two LEGAL landing sites inside the park. One is Stampeed and the other NW of there (can't find the strip now). I was assured that landing elsewhere in Denali, it being designated a "wilderness" park, would result in heavy fines. That said, that place is so frigging huge you'd probably have to land on the road in front of the park HQ just to get caught.Andy Young wrote:I've landed all over Denail National Parl as well, with impunity. Unlike Wrangell-St. Elias, I would not say it's exactly welcome (other than on the glaciers on the south side) but I've never been harassed there either.crbnunit wrote:That is a beautiful area. If that is part of the national park, you can give up that idea right now. If national forest, maybe but doubtful. Agreed about the proximity to the Appalachian Trail. That is probably a deal breaker right there.
The only national park I know of that actually welcomes general aviation is Wrangell/St Elias here in Alaska though I have landed in Gates of the Arctic as well.
In the lower 48, however, I can't imagine being able to land off-field in a national park without serious legal consequences. My understanding is that the only reason we can in Alaska is due to concessions gained during the ANILCA negotiations.
You have to make up your mind about growing up and becoming a pilot. You can't do both!
- Andy Young
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 7:10 am
- Location: Alaska, Antarctica, Colorado, and Others
- Contact:
crbnunit wrote:I specifically asked the rangers the last time I was in Denali. According to them, there are only two LEGAL landing sites inside the park. One is Stampeed and the other NW of there (can't find the strip now). I was assured that landing elsewhere in Denali, it being designated a "wilderness" park, would result in heavy fines. That said, that place is so frigging huge you'd probably have to land on the road in front of the park HQ just to get caught.Andy Young wrote:I've landed all over Denail National Parl as well, with impunity. Unlike Wrangell-St. Elias, I would not say it's exactly welcome (other than on the glaciers on the south side) but I've never been harassed there either.crbnunit wrote:That is a beautiful area. If that is part of the national park, you can give up that idea right now. If national forest, maybe but doubtful. Agreed about the proximity to the Appalachian Trail. That is probably a deal breaker right there.
The only national park I know of that actually welcomes general aviation is Wrangell/St Elias here in Alaska though I have landed in Gates of the Arctic as well.
In the lower 48, however, I can't imagine being able to land off-field in a national park without serious legal consequences. My understanding is that the only reason we can in Alaska is due to concessions gained during the ANILCA negotiations.
There's a lot of misinformation out there amongst the rangers. Keep in mind that most of them come from the lower 48, and are going by what they know to be true there. Also, most of them are seasonal, and their Alaska knowledge only goes so deep.
When I worked for an air taxi that is based deep inside the park (at Kantishna) I landed all over the place, both inside and outside the wilderness. This was after doing some research, and finding that the was no specific prohibition to doing so, and that ANILCA allowed it as a "traditional" Alaska activity. At least some of the rangers were fully aware of my actions, and they never indicated that doing so was not allowed. I have seen several float planes land on Wonder Lake, inside the wilderness area and right next to a ranger station. Occasionally, new rangers stationed there will get wound up about it. But when they check back with headquarters, they are told they can't do anything about it. This part is embarrassing, but I've bent my airplane twice (Scout, not the Maule) landing off-field in the park. Both times, the park helicopter came and picked me up, with a ranger aboard to investigate and write a report. Neither time did they indicate in any way that I wasn't supposed to be landing there, even though I told them that I had done so intentionally.
All of this is under private operations, in my own airplane. Commercial operations are a different story. Commercial operators are limited to landing at the park strip (at the entrance, by the train station); Kantishna; Stampede; and on any of the glaciers on the south side, as long as they are outside the wilderness. Also, landing at the park strip commercially requires a concession permit, though privately you can land there as much as you like.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests