Oil Cooler Secondary Air
- jdsmaule
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 4:25 pm
- Location: Phoenix
- Contact:
Oil Cooler Secondary Air
Does blocking off the 2" SCAT tube that directs air on the side of the oil cooler help lower oil temps? Or does this air flowing over the side of the unit cause a Venturi effect that helps draw air through the cooler?
And is the wire screen for the oil cooler inlet just to keep birds out? Seems like that would restrict air flow to a certain amount.
And is the wire screen for the oil cooler inlet just to keep birds out? Seems like that would restrict air flow to a certain amount.
Jeremy S.
1983 M-6-235
1983 M-6-235
- Andy Young
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 1547
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 7:10 am
- Location: Alaska, Antarctica, Colorado, and Others
- Contact:
- jdsmaule
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 4:25 pm
- Location: Phoenix
- Contact:
- Andy Young
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 1547
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 7:10 am
- Location: Alaska, Antarctica, Colorado, and Others
- Contact:
I have that same set-up. My guess is that the 2" hose is supposed to lower oil temps by adding a little cool air flow over the side of the cooler. I doubt blocking it off would help. I'm guessing you're wondering if doing so would increase upper deck pressure, thereby increasing flow out the main tube to the cooler; I think any effect in that realm would be minimal, but that's just my intuition. I'd be curious to know what you learn if you try it out.
What kind of oil temps are you seeing? On mine (M-6-235, with the IO) I have to block off almost all the air to the cooler just to get up to 180* most days. I'm using a digital temp gauge. I built to built a cockpit-adjustable door to do this, and it's nearly fully closed most of the time.
What kind of oil temps are you seeing? On mine (M-6-235, with the IO) I have to block off almost all the air to the cooler just to get up to 180* most days. I'm using a digital temp gauge. I built to built a cockpit-adjustable door to do this, and it's nearly fully closed most of the time.
- jdsmaule
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 4:25 pm
- Location: Phoenix
- Contact:
The other day with a OAT of ~80F it was indicating around the 190-200 range. Which I understand is right where it should be. But I've been doing some work to get it to this point. This is a new to me airplane. Started flying it back in January in Phoenix when it was cooler (60-70) and several flights in even cooler temps around freezing or just a little under and at the time CHT and oil temps were well in normal range but seemed high for OAT. CHT around freezing or less in cruise before all the work was about 350 (+10 to 20 ish) and oil temp sometimes would be 190-210, sometimes cooler. Oil temps would vary for same OAT between flights. I'm currently running the factory analog gauges so these numbers are based on my interpolation. And from reading on this forum seem to have a history of not being the most accurate instruments.
There was several things I did/ found and each item did not make huge gains. One of which I tried early on was blocking off that 2" SCAT to the oil cooler. Didn't notice any change. But other things I did such as removing the hidden bird nest remnants lodged between the cylinders and inter cylinder baffles, replacing the thermostatic oil cooler bypass valve (although since replacing this temps are consistent), filling the gap on the oil cooler to duct with RTV, RTV around the valve covers, new forward baffles and some other stuff I can't recall at the moment didn't really produce much change either. The most recent thing I did was glass in the missing inlet vertical walls on the lower cowling that were cut down. That seemed to have made a noticeable difference.
So I've begun to wonder if the analog gauge is just not sensitive enough to detect these changes or there was/ is something that is an underlining issue. I was hoping someone with a digital gauge has had experience with blocking off this 2" SCAT and could say it increases/ decreases oil temps by XYZ amount.
Eventually I'll get around to installing a NACA scoop for the oil cooler and go digital gauges, but until than if sticking a piece of aluminum foil tape over a SCAT hole will help I'm game for it!
There was several things I did/ found and each item did not make huge gains. One of which I tried early on was blocking off that 2" SCAT to the oil cooler. Didn't notice any change. But other things I did such as removing the hidden bird nest remnants lodged between the cylinders and inter cylinder baffles, replacing the thermostatic oil cooler bypass valve (although since replacing this temps are consistent), filling the gap on the oil cooler to duct with RTV, RTV around the valve covers, new forward baffles and some other stuff I can't recall at the moment didn't really produce much change either. The most recent thing I did was glass in the missing inlet vertical walls on the lower cowling that were cut down. That seemed to have made a noticeable difference.
So I've begun to wonder if the analog gauge is just not sensitive enough to detect these changes or there was/ is something that is an underlining issue. I was hoping someone with a digital gauge has had experience with blocking off this 2" SCAT and could say it increases/ decreases oil temps by XYZ amount.
Eventually I'll get around to installing a NACA scoop for the oil cooler and go digital gauges, but until than if sticking a piece of aluminum foil tape over a SCAT hole will help I'm game for it!
Jeremy S.
1983 M-6-235
1983 M-6-235
- Andy Young
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 1547
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 7:10 am
- Location: Alaska, Antarctica, Colorado, and Others
- Contact:
- Duane
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 1:58 pm
- Location: moultrie ga
- Contact:
- jdsmaule
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 4:25 pm
- Location: Phoenix
- Contact:
- Andy Young
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 1547
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 7:10 am
- Location: Alaska, Antarctica, Colorado, and Others
- Contact:
-
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2015 7:32 pm
- Location: Brawley, Ca. USA
- Contact:
Duane, I live in one of the hotter dryer places on the planet, (we hit 100 degrees two days last week). What's your opinion of the feasibility and likelihood of improved cooling performance by changing out the 235HP set up for the NACA duct and larger oil cooler setup used on the 260HP IO 540 ? I think that there was a guy working on an STC for this swap, but I don't know where that has gone. Regards, Ed
- jdsmaule
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 4:25 pm
- Location: Phoenix
- Contact:
Center baffle is in place with new baffle seals on top. Actually new baffle seals all around the engine. And I have verified with everything installed that there are no gaps or waves when upper cowl is on. Regarding the center baffle, I have some baffle seal material on the bottom in and around the number 2 cylinder push rod tubes that could be improved on but is not terrible. And there is a gap between center baffle and engine where it makes that bend off center between cyl 4 and 2. Appears to have never had baffle seal material in that area. Is there suppose to be seal material down to the engine case in that area?
Jeremy S.
1983 M-6-235
1983 M-6-235
- Andy Young
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 1547
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 7:10 am
- Location: Alaska, Antarctica, Colorado, and Others
- Contact:
No, no baffle seal material typically installed at the bottom of that piece. If it were me, I wouldn't pull my hair out any further until I got accurate instrumentation on it. Or at least test the accuracy of your legacy gauges. Put the sensor in hot water with an accurate thermometer in the water, and compare reading to panel gauge.
- Duane
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 1:58 pm
- Location: moultrie ga
- Contact:
- jdsmaule
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 4:25 pm
- Location: Phoenix
- Contact:
Good point Andy, I'm trying to keep what remaining hair I have left!
Duane, can you post or email a pic of the 260 oil cooler setup? I've looked on the parts CD and saw the oil cooler install for the 235 and NACA scoops, but no luck finding drawings for the 260. I may have just missed it though. Even if only approved for 260 I can't see getting a field approval for the 235 being an issue.
Duane, can you post or email a pic of the 260 oil cooler setup? I've looked on the parts CD and saw the oil cooler install for the 235 and NACA scoops, but no luck finding drawings for the 260. I may have just missed it though. Even if only approved for 260 I can't see getting a field approval for the 235 being an issue.
Jeremy S.
1983 M-6-235
1983 M-6-235
- jdsmaule
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 4:25 pm
- Location: Phoenix
- Contact:
Follow up - I recently installed EI's CGR-30 combo, replacing ALL analog gauges. Well worth the time and expense. The final push was when the oil pressure gauge would wiggle on the low end after being warmed up. Analog CHT and oil temp were indicating high compared to digital. Consistently seeing CHTs between 250 and 280, oil temp around 166 in cruise, if I fly best climb angle for 1,500-2000ft can get temps up around 190 but cool down once in cruise again. This is with OAT on the ground around 75-80F. This is in stark contrast to what I was seeing last winter with analog gauges. Oil pressure has been steady, analog was indicating about 10-15psi on the low side. Analog tach was low about 150RPM. Fuel flow/ totalizer has been spot on without adjusting K-factor. And as a added bonus I was able to calibrate the unit to each individual fuel tank and have reasonably well behaved quantity indications now.
Highly recommend digital gauges!
Highly recommend digital gauges!
Jeremy S.
1983 M-6-235
1983 M-6-235
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests