Very Reasonably Priced LED Landing Lights?

Mods, approval, 337's, STC's, fun with the Feds.
User avatar
crbnunit
100+ Posts
Posts: 1890
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 12:42 pm
Location: Alaska
Contact:

Post by crbnunit »

Talk with YellowMaule. See if he is still happy with his choice of landing lights.
You have to make up your mind about growing up and becoming a pilot. You can't do both!

Pbfl510
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 5:49 pm
Location: Houston
Contact:

Post by Pbfl510 »

AJ,

I also chatted with the Teledyne guys, specifically Jonathan Muro. He now has the drawings and has sent them to his FAA contact. He said it should take a couple of months to get the approval since they have a good relationship with them.

We'll see.

I have not looked at all the specs, but what are some of the major differences between the Alphabeams and Prometheus Plus? Which one would you recommend?

Thanks,

PB

User avatar
aero101
100+ Posts
Posts: 2145
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:18 pm
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Contact:

Post by aero101 »

The Alpha Beams are much brighter, by far brightest LED Landing Light that I've seen... Priced about the same, non polarity, etc...
Jim
http://www.northstar-aero.com

Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys.

User avatar
ajak
100+ Posts
Posts: 142
Joined: Sat May 09, 2015 12:20 pm
Location: Wolf Lake, AK
Contact:

LED landing light upgrade

Post by ajak »

I'm afraid I can't comment on the Whelen (Prometheus Plus) vs. AlphaBeam LED lights, as I haven't had the chance to directly compare them. My neighbor has switched over to the Rigid PAR36, though (Model 62010. Watts: 40, Ampere Draw: 2.90, LED's 4, Lumens: 3400). I was pretty much sold after watching him land in his VERY lighted up C-180 a while back- he had a Rigid landing light mounted in each wingtip, and the Prometheus Plus lights in both standard nose light mounts. From the ground while he was on approach, the Rigids appeared much brighter.

I just got a 337 approval for the Rigids, and am in the process of changing over from the old incandescents now. Here are a couple of comparison pictures I just took from inside my hangar, pointing across the taxiway. Hopefully I can get them to post... It was pitch dark outside, and there was no supplementary lighting on the taxiway.

Image

Camera on tripod right in front of prop spinner. There was a bit more light from the incandescent than what it looks like, but it definitely looked dim next to the LED:
Image

AJ
AJ
1983 M-6-235
IO-540W1A5D, 81" Hartzell, 4" ext gear, 31" tires, Atlee exhaust, long wings, VGs, LED ldg/nav/strobes, EDM-900, CiES

Mountain Doctor
100+ Posts
Posts: 1665
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:31 am
Contact:

Post by Mountain Doctor »

My word that's impressive.
I am an AME in Richland, Washington. Please call for an appointment!

560 Gage Blvd.
Richland, WA 99352
(509) 628-2843

User avatar
gbarrier
100+ Posts
Posts: 1560
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 5:41 pm
Location: 9NR4 North Carolina
Contact:

Post by gbarrier »

Anybody use the AERO Sunspot 36LX yet. Looks like 45W and 1,500+ lumens.

Website Says: The PMA’d SunSpot 36 LX was designed as a PAR 36 drop in replacement. (Reference Incandescent Bulb Cross Reference Guide by clicking on link). The SunSpot 36 LX is available in a landing or taxi light.

User avatar
captnkirk
100+ Posts
Posts: 942
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2013 4:54 pm
Location: Cherryville NC
Contact:

Post by captnkirk »

Gbarrier are thinking of using the pulse model for the wig wag effect or just straight landing/taxi light. I still want to add a wig wag system for visibility and I've installed my last two GE's. So when those burn out I plan on upgrading to LED's. Looks like the Aeros might kill 2 bird with one stone.
Kirk Johnson
If god had meant man to fly he would have given him more money

User avatar
gbarrier
100+ Posts
Posts: 1560
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 5:41 pm
Location: 9NR4 North Carolina
Contact:

Post by gbarrier »

Their website says this:

The Sunspot 36LX landing and taxi lights can be installed with just a log book entry if you can install the light in an existing mount and use the existing wires, switches, and circuit breakers.
The Sunspot 36HX landing and taxi lights can be installed with the pulse function enabled in models listed on the AML under STC, or in other aircraft models with a 337 that uses the STC as a basis for approval.

Looks like your iA should be able to Wig Wag you right up. I have the original Pulse Lite system so looks like I could do with the log book entry version. I would prefer to loose the old system and don't mind the 337 but hate stringing the additional wire through each wing.

Rezrider
100+ Posts
Posts: 487
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 7:53 am
Location: CO
Contact:

Post by Rezrider »

gbarrier wrote:Anybody use the AERO Sunspot 36LX yet. Looks like 45W and 1,500+ lumens.

Website Says: The PMA’d SunSpot 36 LX was designed as a PAR 36 drop in replacement. (Reference Incandescent Bulb Cross Reference Guide by clicking on link). The SunSpot 36 LX is available in a landing or taxi light.
Yip, I put them in at last annual and they are fantastic. I have them wired for wigwag then just flick a switch and they are steady on.
I have the taxi bulb on one side angled downwards for night taxi.
Kinda pricey but then you don't need the separate pulse unit, you take these bulbs with you if you change planes!

The enhanced visibility in backcountry situations is a huge safety benefit.
1980 M5-235
Four Corners

User avatar
gbarrier
100+ Posts
Posts: 1560
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 5:41 pm
Location: 9NR4 North Carolina
Contact:

Post by gbarrier »

Thanks Rez for your input. Is the taxi unit necessary or could you do with two landing? How much wider is the field of light? My primary use will be for the "be seen" value.

Rezrider
100+ Posts
Posts: 487
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 7:53 am
Location: CO
Contact:

Post by Rezrider »

The taxi bulb has grooved lines on the lens that spread the beam wider. I think it helps for taxiing but still has great visibility in flight.
I've heard from people watching me fly in that they saw me miles away due to the pulsing lights. They can't tell any difference from far away which bulbs are which.
I vote for one of each type.

Perhaps I should add that if you are only getting one bulb then get the landing one. If you are getting two bulbs then get one of each.
Part of the reason I did this upgrade was the fact that I was adding the second light to my Maule. It only had the one light on the left wing.
1980 M5-235
Four Corners

User avatar
gdflys
100+ Posts
Posts: 283
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2013 11:31 pm
Location: CT
Contact:

Post by gdflys »

Worked on some Christmas present upgrades today. I searched around for some comparisons but they are tough to find. Hope these may help anyone who hasn't already made the switch to LEDs.

4509 bulbs and old lenses

<a><img src="https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4639/254 ... 407c_c.jpg" width="800" height="600" alt="Whelen Prometheus Plus LED Upgrade"></a><script></script>

Whelen Prometheus Plus Landing Light on the left amd Taxi Light on the right with new lenses

<a><img src="https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4685/254 ... c9b4_c.jpg" width="800" height="600" alt="Whelen Prometheus Plus LED Upgrade"></a><script></script>

4509 pattern, color, and brightness

<a><img src="https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4693/254 ... 17a6_c.jpg" width="800" height="600" alt="Whelen Prometheus Plus LED Upgrade"></a><script></script>

LED Landing Light pattern, color, and brightness

<a><img src="https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4688/386 ... 0bd6_c.jpg" width="800" height="600" alt="Whelen Prometheus Plus LED Upgrade"></a><script></script>

LED Taxi Light pattern, color, brightness

<a><img src="https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4729/386 ... 3719_c.jpg" width="800" height="600" alt="Whelen Prometheus Plus LED Upgrade"></a><script></script>

Quick video showing all the above

https://youtu.be/jprxet1HuuE
Greg Delp
1979 M-5-235C
CT
ATP, CFI, A&P/IA

User avatar
crbnunit
100+ Posts
Posts: 1890
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 12:42 pm
Location: Alaska
Contact:

Post by crbnunit »

Came across these today...

https://www.illumi-vation.com/product-p ... taxi-light

Claim to be 60% brighter than any certified LED. A bargain at only $3400/ea.
You have to make up your mind about growing up and becoming a pilot. You can't do both!

User avatar
Chris in Milwaukee
100+ Posts
Posts: 463
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2016 10:24 am
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by Chris in Milwaukee »

Holy crap :shock:
Christopher Owens
1993 MX-7-180A
Members: AOPA EAA VAA

Hale-Yes
100+ Posts
Posts: 212
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2015 7:32 pm
Location: Brawley, Ca. USA
Contact:

Post by Hale-Yes »

Yea, but you get 4 lights for that price! That brings them all the way down to $849.00 each ! I guess there made from graphene and unatainum. Ed Hale

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests