three blade prop for M-5-235C

Discussion on keeping your aircraft airworthy and legal and/or any technical topics.


Post Reply
pitts10ch
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 6:25 pm
Contact:

three blade prop for M-5-235C

Post by pitts10ch »

Hi all,

Is there an STC or method of putting some three blade prop on an M-5-235C with an O-540J1A5D? If so, which one? Thanks very much.

Chris

By the way all, the bird is for sale on Barnstormers Red and white and 2000 restoration. Thanks again.

User avatar
YELLOWMAULE
100+ Posts
Posts: 790
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 11:49 am
Location: AK
Contact:

Post by YELLOWMAULE »

Calling TomD..... 8)

User avatar
TomD
100+ Posts
Posts: 1361
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 7:13 pm
Location: Seattle area ( S43 )
Contact:

Three blade

Post by TomD »

One Mr. Jeremy Ainsworth has the STC for a Mac. three blade.

I have one hanging in front of my O-540J1A5D and love it.

TD

g5280
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 10:17 pm
Location: Los Angeles,CA / Pharump,NV
Contact:

Post by g5280 »

I got my 3 blade prop about 8 maybe 10years a gohttp://www.mauleak.com/ that would be Jeremy
Gary, Maule 9159E
1977 M5 235 IO 540J
Tundra Tires

pitts10ch
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 6:25 pm
Contact:

three blades

Post by pitts10ch »

What type of performance changes can one expect from the addition of a three blade prop on the M-5-235? Thanks guys.

CH

User avatar
maules.com
100+ Posts
Posts: 3144
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 4:01 pm
Contact:

Post by maules.com »

Pros: Quieter for pilot and passengers and those on the ground, smoother for pilot, rivets, welds, electric connections, instruments, etc so less fatigue. Faster acceleration to wing lift speed and greater climb rate in vx best angle over the obstacle, then at vy best rate and cruise not much difference. Same cruise speed in standard configuration but slightly faster in dirty configuration with floats or big bushwheels.
Sex appeal.
Cons: Cost more to buy. Cost more to repair if damaged. Weighs 16lbs more than 2 blade. Not as much reserve metal to keep filing off if working in larger agregate rock bars or beaches. Harder to prop start.
Personally I use 3 blade for smooth and quiet and initial thrust.
Jeremy
www.maules.com
Maule AK Worldwide

User avatar
maules.com
100+ Posts
Posts: 3144
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 4:01 pm
Contact:

Post by maules.com »

The above comparisons are versus the 81 inch McCauley two blade which is superior to the older 81inch Hartzell and far superior to the old 78inch Hartzell.
Jeremy
www.maules.com
Maule AK Worldwide

benflyn
100+ Posts
Posts: 176
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 9:55 am
Location: Starvation Flats, Wyoming
Contact:

Post by benflyn »

Jeremy,

Is there any otions for a M5-210tc outside the hartzell 78"?
Had any experience with the MT's?

Thanks!!

Butch

User avatar
maules.com
100+ Posts
Posts: 3144
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 4:01 pm
Contact:

Post by maules.com »

I know of no other prop but that does'nt mean there is'nt one. Maule was testing an MT on the 180 and 235 at one time but I think cost was restrictive and the idea died away or is on back burner.
Jeremy
www.maules.com
Maule AK Worldwide

User avatar
UP-M5
100+ Posts
Posts: 579
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:22 am
Location: AK
Contact:

Post by UP-M5 »

so it is time for me to buy a new prop, and i want to make the most educated choice that i can. i have talked to lots of people about this, but thought i would throw it out to everyone here. i am narrowed down to the 3 blade mac or the 2 blade 81" mac. the 2 blade 84" mac wouldn't be legal on 8.50 tires that i run in the winter with my wheel skis- as far as i know. if i am incorrect about this please let me know.
so i initially was set on the 3 blade due to the high sex appeal, but the more i talk to folks operating them up here (AK) the more i am leaning toward the 2 blade 81incher. the float guys are having good luck with the 3 blade, and i hope to be on floats in the not too distant future, but i am in the gravel and rocks most of the time now.
i know price difference is a couple grand. but i have a mint condition spinner assembly for a 3 blade already, and that could offset that difference.
so lets hear it 235 owners- anyone have experience with both or either??? which prop has the highest thrust? i have heard different answers depending on who i ask :?:
M5-235

a64pilot
100+ Posts
Posts: 1773
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 6:53 am
Location: ALbany Ga., KABY
Contact:

Post by a64pilot »

I have the Hartzell Scimitar. Can't comment on the Mac. I only fly on wheels. Gut feeling is that there isn't much difference between it and the 2 bld Hartzell performance wise, except the three blade costs more and weighs more. The three bld is smoother though. I got mine for a little less than the cost of a two bld from Hartzell as it had 6.5 hours on it. The cost being less and maybe it will help re-sale one day is why I bought it.
At least with the Hartzell, if your expecting a big performance gain then you will be disappointed.
I think most people will think there is an increase in performance, based mostly because of all the money they spent. If you are buying it mostly for the looks then you won't be disappointed.

User avatar
Flyin'Dutch'
Posts: 61
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 4:41 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Flyin'Dutch' »

From my understanding Jeremy's Januarly post sums it up neatly.
Previously M5-235C GBVFT
FAA CPL/IR AME CAA PPL

User avatar
210TC
100+ Posts
Posts: 733
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:58 pm
Location: New Braunfels, Tx
Contact:

Post by 210TC »

I was talked into a four blade on my rocket. Smooooooth lots of clearance and the engine will accelerate like a racing engine. Got good high altitude performance, lost elsewhere.
If I had it to do over again I WOULD UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES CONDUCT BIZ WITH MT PROP AGAIN. They set a new standard for the worst words in the dictionary. GET everything in writing or you will be sorry. Check for law suit's against MT for FALSE and deceptive practices.
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED
Remember, LONG props climb the best. Thrust test are easy to do and don't lie.

User avatar
maules.com
100+ Posts
Posts: 3144
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 4:01 pm
Contact:

Post by maules.com »

An addendum to 'long props climb the best'.....but only as long as the tip speed remains below the speed of sound.
For example the 86" two blade McCauley I developed for the 2400rpm O540J engine can work well, but at 2700rpm on the IO540V 260hp it is too fast at the tip and must be cut down.
Jeremy
www.maules.com
Maule AK Worldwide

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests