@Nick -- PM sent, I think. Having a bit of trouble with sending PM's.
@FlyHound, thanks for that tip about bigger particles hiding in the oil filter, that might result in the oil suggesting things are better than they actually are.
New to forum, thinking of buying . . .
- Brenton C
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 5:03 am
- Location: Calgary, AB
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 7:53 am
- Location: Williamsburg, VA
- Contact:
I had 250 hours in a 172 and four in a DA-40 and I went with the trigear MXT7-180. Insurance first year (2006) was just over $1400 annually with $100k on the hull and $1 million liability. Trigears are a little slower than the tailwheels in cruise but it fit my misson well, which sounds similar to yours. Outside of landing on gravel bars the trigear can handle just about anything you can safely throw at it.
As respects transition, it was quite easy. First takeoff there was a lot of rotation back and forth about the longitudinal axis as the ailerons are not nearly as large on the Maule as they are on the 172. Overcame that by the third takeoff. Landings can be a little more abrupt as the Maule doesn't glide as well, but it takes harder landings well. Good to go there on the second landing. Getting used to the CS prop and different avionics were the only other issues.
Quite frankly, I didn't have the courage to go with the conventional gear. Having learned to fly in my 50s I recognized my hand/eye isn't what it once was. The trigear made sense for me and was an excellent choice. I would encourage you to consider a trigear, as well. You'll find the insurance cost a fraction than that of the tailwheels, and there's likely a reason for it.
Good luck in your search.
As respects transition, it was quite easy. First takeoff there was a lot of rotation back and forth about the longitudinal axis as the ailerons are not nearly as large on the Maule as they are on the 172. Overcame that by the third takeoff. Landings can be a little more abrupt as the Maule doesn't glide as well, but it takes harder landings well. Good to go there on the second landing. Getting used to the CS prop and different avionics were the only other issues.
Quite frankly, I didn't have the courage to go with the conventional gear. Having learned to fly in my 50s I recognized my hand/eye isn't what it once was. The trigear made sense for me and was an excellent choice. I would encourage you to consider a trigear, as well. You'll find the insurance cost a fraction than that of the tailwheels, and there's likely a reason for it.
Good luck in your search.
- Brenton C
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 5:03 am
- Location: Calgary, AB
- Contact:
- MAU MAU
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Fri May 24, 2013 5:01 am
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
With regards to the asking prices on aircraft, remember that some sellers think their craft is made of gold, some are looking for what they may owe, and the last group are the ones that are realistic.
I had 1130 hours in taildragger's and was quoted $1710.00 for a M-7 235 taildragger with 130k hull and 1M liability, and $806.00 for a MXT-7-180A tri-gear with 100k hull and 1M.
I chose the tri-gear as my wife is learning to fly and I wanted to keep it as basic as possible. It lands great in short grass strips, logging roads and pretty much any other place you may want to go.
If you think you may want to frequently land on soft sand or rock strewn strips, the bigger tires on the conventional gear will serve you better.
Choose the craft that will suit your mission the best and don't look back.
I had 1130 hours in taildragger's and was quoted $1710.00 for a M-7 235 taildragger with 130k hull and 1M liability, and $806.00 for a MXT-7-180A tri-gear with 100k hull and 1M.
I chose the tri-gear as my wife is learning to fly and I wanted to keep it as basic as possible. It lands great in short grass strips, logging roads and pretty much any other place you may want to go.
If you think you may want to frequently land on soft sand or rock strewn strips, the bigger tires on the conventional gear will serve you better.
Choose the craft that will suit your mission the best and don't look back.
MXT-7-180A Comet
- Brenton C
- 100+ Posts
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 5:03 am
- Location: Calgary, AB
- Contact:
- Flyin'Dutch'
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 4:41 pm
- Location: UK
- Contact:
How very true.xwildcat wrote:Machines break when you use them. They REALLY break when you don't.
I bought an aeroplane many years ago that had not been used regularly for the previous 5 and during the first year every turning and rotating bit needed some attention at some point.
No problem and ended up with a great aeroplane but make sure that a) you are aware and b) the purchase price reflects this.
People who are not flexible in price and rate their aeroplane as 9.5/10 are unlikely to be willing sellers.
Caveat Emptor!
Previously M5-235C GBVFT
FAA CPL/IR AME CAA PPL
FAA CPL/IR AME CAA PPL
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:32 pm
- Location: Jackson, MS
- Contact:
purchasing your own airplane.
Brenton,
We own an MxT-180 2008.
We had owned an Mx-180 2007 tail wheel.
Unless you are mostly turf, grass flying, may I recommend the nose wheel.
When we went from tail to nose dragger, our insurance was cut by 50%.
Unless you have several years in a tail dragger, the insurance will be very costly.
Don't get me wrong, tail draggers are down right sexy. But like a sexy lady, they can get very.... very ... tempermental when landing crosswind.
The stats prove this, which is why insurance is 1/2 with a nose wheel for low time pilots.
I have over 600 hours, mostly in the MxT-180.
We love the utility of the Maule.
I have landed her in some real tough crosswinds, and with short timed unpredictable shifting wind gusts,
and she is a gutsy ol' girl.
Just make certain to approach close to 'the numbers', then add a little throttle to improve control if it is real snotty. That way, if you need a go-around, you are not gassing her at a low idle.
It is a buyer's market. Take your time, and enjoy the search.
Safe flying, and happy hunting.
Steve and Lisa Giarratana
Connecticut
We own an MxT-180 2008.
We had owned an Mx-180 2007 tail wheel.
Unless you are mostly turf, grass flying, may I recommend the nose wheel.
When we went from tail to nose dragger, our insurance was cut by 50%.
Unless you have several years in a tail dragger, the insurance will be very costly.
Don't get me wrong, tail draggers are down right sexy. But like a sexy lady, they can get very.... very ... tempermental when landing crosswind.
The stats prove this, which is why insurance is 1/2 with a nose wheel for low time pilots.
I have over 600 hours, mostly in the MxT-180.
We love the utility of the Maule.
I have landed her in some real tough crosswinds, and with short timed unpredictable shifting wind gusts,
and she is a gutsy ol' girl.
Just make certain to approach close to 'the numbers', then add a little throttle to improve control if it is real snotty. That way, if you need a go-around, you are not gassing her at a low idle.
It is a buyer's market. Take your time, and enjoy the search.
Safe flying, and happy hunting.
Steve and Lisa Giarratana
Connecticut
Passing the faster planes, as they re-fuel ðŸ˜
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 66 guests