Seaplane Rating Begins!

If you would like to share where you have flown to today (with pictures and/or stories), this is the new section to go to...
Post Reply
User avatar
Chris in Milwaukee
100+ Posts
Posts: 463
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2016 10:24 am
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Seaplane Rating Begins!

Post by Chris in Milwaukee »

As I'm absolutely planning for a life on the water in my plane (when it isn't frozen solid, of course). My wife bought me an early birthday present today of my first seaplane lesson! 1.3 hours in a Citabria 150 on straight floats. What an amazing experience!

Image

Image

My first flight was with Sandi Randall at Romeo Aviation in Cumberland, WI, although we flew from her place in Luck, WI. Great instructor, great adventure!

Now to decide whether it's worth it to outfit the MX-A with floats or not. I don't have H2O at both ends, so amphibs are needed. Reading through the archives, it might be sketchy at best on a 180, but I do have the Universal Wings...

~Chris
Christopher Owens
1993 MX-7-180A
Members: AOPA EAA VAA

User avatar
HeavyLoad
100+ Posts
Posts: 124
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2017 9:46 pm
Location: Battle Ground, WA
Contact:

Post by HeavyLoad »

Looks fun! I need to try it someday.

User avatar
TomD
100+ Posts
Posts: 1361
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 7:13 pm
Location: Seattle area ( S43 )
Contact:

Post by TomD »

First "taste" is free.....

Great fun. I really enjoyed my floats for the years that I flew them. I have been flying on wheels in the summers lately due to the access to such beautiful back country. Gotta get back on floats soon.

As long as you are not trying to operate out of high lakes or rivers, I would think a M7 180 should work OK.

TD

User avatar
Chris in Milwaukee
100+ Posts
Posts: 463
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2016 10:24 am
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by Chris in Milwaukee »

TomD wrote:First "taste" is free.....

Great fun. I really enjoyed my floats for the years that I flew them. I have been flying on wheels in the summers lately due to the access to such beautiful back country. Gotta get back on floats soon.

As long as you are not trying to operate out of high lakes or rivers, I would think a M7 180 should work OK.

TD
The archives tell many different versions of the story, for sure. Compiling all of the experIences, it seems that it would be an acceptable 2-place amphib here in the flatlands of Wisconsin and surrounding areas. Out west would be another story altogether.

A new set of floats cost more than the current value of the plane. But so does an avionics upgrade, recover, etc. (tongue in cheek). But we don't buy airplanes to make money, do we? :lol:
Christopher Owens
1993 MX-7-180A
Members: AOPA EAA VAA

User avatar
Undaunted
100+ Posts
Posts: 129
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 1:14 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by Undaunted »

Chris,
I friend just finished up his Seaplane rating with Sandi. He had a great time, and is now looking for a float plane (to add to his collection).
Enjoy
Michael
1999 M7-235C

User avatar
Chris in Milwaukee
100+ Posts
Posts: 463
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2016 10:24 am
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by Chris in Milwaukee »

Excellent! I live over four hours' drive from there, but the flight isn't bad. So when I go back to finish, I'd like to finish it in short order, if possible. In and out!
Christopher Owens
1993 MX-7-180A
Members: AOPA EAA VAA

User avatar
andy
Site Admin
Posts: 1662
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 2:05 pm
Location: Lake James, NC, USA
Contact:

Post by andy »

Flying seaplanes is great fun. Second only to helicopters and back country airstrips in my opinion.

I did a fair amount of research on the idea of putting amphibs on my MX-7-180 and decided not to do it. The net weight gain of 400+ pounds along with the shorter 30'10" wing would make a poor performer with not much useful load out of the airplane.

Straight floats are a different story but then finding AVGAS without ethanol in the lower 48 becomes a problem. I even considered an auto gas conversion STC so I could get gas at boat marinas (without ethanol), but the power loss involved in using 89 octane fuel would make the performance unacceptable to me.

Jim has a MX-7-180 with the longer wing on straight floats and he likes it. However, I think he's in Fairbanks and AVGAS for straight-floated aircraft isn't a problem. Jim, is that correct?
Andy
1986 MX7-180
Image

User avatar
andy
Site Admin
Posts: 1662
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 2:05 pm
Location: Lake James, NC, USA
Contact:

Post by andy »

Sorry, I meant finding AVGAS in the lower 48 for a floatplane is a problem. AVGAS of course doesn't have ethanol.
Andy
1986 MX7-180
Image

User avatar
Chris in Milwaukee
100+ Posts
Posts: 463
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2016 10:24 am
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by Chris in Milwaukee »

Yes, given that and the cost of floats acquisition, it may end up just being a rating to get but not use. That is, unless, I end up buying a 235 or something with floats already on it. Thankfully, I do have the longer (32'11") universal wings.

That, and talking the CFO into it, of course. :wink:
Christopher Owens
1993 MX-7-180A
Members: AOPA EAA VAA

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests