"Winds 260 at 30. Gusts 41"

NEW Section:
Post and find topics related to Airports, airparks and flying destinations to the section...
Post Reply
Mountain Doctor
100+ Posts
Posts: 1665
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:31 am
Contact:

"Winds 260 at 30. Gusts 41"

Post by Mountain Doctor »

Runway heading 200.

I went for it. :D

I think I was the only GA plane flying out of Vista Field (S98) today. :wink:

Out here in the desert high winds are common, and life is short.

So if a guy can't fly in the wind he misses out on a lot. I use days like today to practice.

With my Trigear it wasn't so hard. I still had rudder left. My touchdowns were even pretty soft and smooth, although groundspeed was obviously quite low. 8)

Maules can Git 'er done for sure. :P
I am an AME in Richland, Washington. Please call for an appointment!

560 Gage Blvd.
Richland, WA 99352
(509) 628-2843

Mountain Doctor
100+ Posts
Posts: 1665
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:31 am
Contact:

Post by Mountain Doctor »

My gosh I just did the math on that. It's a 30 knot crosswind! Can that be? :?:
I am an AME in Richland, Washington. Please call for an appointment!

560 Gage Blvd.
Richland, WA 99352
(509) 628-2843

SlowFlyer
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 10:41 am
Location: Panama
Contact:

Post by SlowFlyer »

Thas 26kt CW with 35kt CW gusts, sounds scary!

Mountain Doctor
100+ Posts
Posts: 1665
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:31 am
Contact:

Post by Mountain Doctor »

I don't know why but it really wasn't so hard.

FWIW I was at my home airport, 4,100 X 100 feet so I had the option of landing diagonally into the wind if I wanted. Also, FWIW I have 800 hours in this plane and for the most part it's the only one I fly.

There's an expression in the gun world:

"Beware the man who has only one gun. He probably knows how to shoot it". :wink:

The only extra variable was the gustiness. I had to work the throttle all the way to, and past, touchdown.
I am an AME in Richland, Washington. Please call for an appointment!

560 Gage Blvd.
Richland, WA 99352
(509) 628-2843

User avatar
Lowflybye
100+ Posts
Posts: 351
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:16 pm
Location: Madison, AL
Contact:

Post by Lowflybye »

Mountain Doctor wrote:I don't know why but it really wasn't so hard.

FWIW I was at my home airport, 4,100 X 100 feet so I had the option of landing diagonally into the wind if I wanted.
If you went diagonally into the wind then you did not have a crosswind relative to the aircraft, only relative to the runway. The wind relative to the aircraft's desired direction of travel was a headwind. The plane doesn't know which direction the runway is so it then becomes simply a mental thing. Remember this when you takeoff or land across a runway and the local FAA ball buster questions you on why you thought you had the skills to fly with a crosswind component in excess of the demonstrated. It's not a crosswind if you turn it into a headwind. :wink:
"To most people, the sky is the limit. To a pilot, the sky is home."

Still a bit cloudy when it comes to aviation insurance? Find some clarity: Clear on Top

Mountain Doctor
100+ Posts
Posts: 1665
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:31 am
Contact:

Post by Mountain Doctor »

If you went diagonally into the wind then you did not have a crosswind relative to the aircraft, only relative to the runway.

Yup.

I had the option of landing diagonally into the wind if I wanted.

I did not exercise this option but landed on runway heading. Landing diagonally was a safety option I could have chosen but did not need.
I am an AME in Richland, Washington. Please call for an appointment!

560 Gage Blvd.
Richland, WA 99352
(509) 628-2843

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests